About | ACP | Buy | Forum | Industry Watch | Learning Curve | Search | Twitter | Xnews
Home » Industry Watch » The Technological

Assange: The Intractable Marianne Ny

'What we're able to tell you at this time is that we're not able to tell you anything.'


Buy It

Try It

STOCKHOLM/LONDON (Rixstep) — The world is in a deadlock. Julian Assange has been granted diplomatic asylum in Ecuador because Ecuador found Marianne Ny intractable. And Marianne Ny has long claimed it's 'illegal' for her to question Julian Assange in the UK. This was the same 'desafinado' tune sung by minister of foreign affairs Carl Bildt to Jennifer Robinson this past summer in Sweden.

Marianne Ny went so far as to tell Time Magazine back in December 2010 that it was illegal not only under Swedish law but under British law too.

But that's a prevarication of course - nothing's illegal and the Mutual Legal Assistance system is used all the time for precisely these circumstances. And yet the whole world has waited for two years now.

It's only weeks ago one first saw definite cracks in Marianne Ny's claim. Her office was contacted after she'd refused Ecuador's offer to question Julian Assange at the embassy in Knightsbridge. The claim - as published then in the Swedish media - was still that such an interrogation was illegal.

But when asked to cite which specific statutes made it illegal under Swedish law (no one wanted to burden the Swedes with also digging into British law, of which they ostensibly know very little) Marianne Ny's office came up with nothing and began to blame the Swedish media for 'getting it all wrong'.

Fredrik Berg at Marianne Ny's office instead let slip that what Marianne Ny has consistently described for the past two years as something 'illegal' was merely 'something we're not interested in'.

So Martha Kearney contacted Marianne Ny's media contact Karin Rosander for another gem of an interview. Rosander is of course infamous for her interview back in August 2010 with Al Jazeera.



Marianne Ny reopened a closed case against Julian Assange on the merits of a broken condom which was part of an investigation Eva Finné had already closed, a case she pointedly ordered the police to not touch anymore.

But Mats Gehlin, working in collaboration with Claes Borgström, snuck off a condom to the state forensic lab under the pretence it was connected to another case. The condom was returned one month later with negative results: the condom was indeed torn, and it did not appear to have been torn by mechanical means, but it also showed no traces of genomic DNA, meaning it hadn't been used for sex.

And yet this is purportedly the 'legal fiction' Marianne Ny used to reopen the case against Julian Assange at the behest of her buddy, colleague, and fellow state feminist Claes Borgström.

The condom wouldn't prove anything anyway. None of the parties involved in the case denied having sex. The condom was merely a bit of 'legal fiction' used to reopen a case Eva Finné had already closed because 'no crime was committed'.

Marianne Ny has been playing 'cat and mouse' with Julian Assange ever since. And the world waits and the world's patience is running out.

KR: The prosecutor has stated that, according to circumstances in the investigation, her opinion is that it's necessary that he is present in Sweden, and she hasn't stated exactly what circumstances, but that's her statements [sic].

MK: But isn't it the case that Swedish prosecutors have gone abroad to question defendants in serious cases at other times?
KR: Yes, that's true, it has happened. And it's for the individual - it's for the prosecutor to decide which measures to take. So it's... it's all about what the prosecutor decides to do.

MK: But what you're saying is there are circumstances in this case that make it very different. It's hard to understand what they might be!
KR: Yeah. And the prosecutor hasn't stated exactly what kind of circumstance - what circumstances - but that's her... her decision.

MK: Would it be possible to reach some kind of agreement with Julian Assange that he wouldn't be extradited to United States, because that's what he says he's frightened of if he were to agree to travel to Sweden?
KR: Well that's not exactly for the prosecutor to decide because that's uh... a decision uh... that has to be made by the Swedish government.

MK: Wouldn't it be possible to interview him by video link, by some kind of video phone?
KR: The prosecutor has uh... stated that it's... it's necessary for him being present in Sweden. And that's uh... all she can say at the moment.

MK: One other form of compromise that has been suggested is that he would be interviewed in the Swedish embassy, so technically on Swedish soil.
KR: Yeah. But that doesn't really uh... change it because the prosecutor's opinion is that it's necessary he is actually present in Sweden, according to the circumstances within this investigation.

MK: Given what's at stake here - it's now become a great international question now, hasn't it, with Ecuador, the UK, and Sweden all being involved - shouldn't the Swedish prosecutor spell out more clearly her reasons for taking this stand?
KR: No. Her decision is that at this stage of the investigation she does not want to specify.

MK: So how is the deadlock going to be resolved then?
KR: Uhhh... I have no idea really.

Karin Rosander has been described on YouTube as 'the worst prosecutor ever' but that epithet has to be reserved for Marianne Ny. Karin is only a media contact. To her credit however, she does belong to the Facebook group 'Intelligent classy well-educated women who say 'f*ck' a lot'.

I'm so sick of it all. Will it never end? At any rate I want to say the other girl's just as much to blame.
 - Anna Ardin

Apparently Swedish laws are unique. If you have a penis you're half a rapist before you even get through customs.
 - Scott Adams

If I am able to reveal what I know, everyone will realise this is all a charade. If I could tell the British courts, I suspect it would make extradition a moot point.
 - Björn Hurtig

I can tell you that the Swedish prosecution still hasn't provided copies of those SMS texts that have been referred to. Those texts are some of the most powerful exculpatory evidence. In Australia prosecutors have a very grave duty to disclose such evidence to courts when seeking the grave exercise of a court's power against an individual. Yet in Sweden in this case, in the first hearings to obtain an arrest warrant, those texts were not submitted to the Swedish court, which is highly improper.
 - James Catlin

The prosecutor could achieve this broadening of the law during Assange's trial so he can be convicted of a crime that didn't exist at the time he allegedly committed it. She would need to. There is no precedent for this. The Swedes are making it up as they go along.
 - James Catlin

Julian Assange will surely learn that considering what WikiLeaks has published, he's got a few enemies in the Pentagon, the CIA, and the White House. Sweden began an investigation into rape which was later dismissed. Assange was even denied residence in Sweden. One can only speculate to what extent the security agencies of the US were involved. And considering the obvious interest of the US to silence WikiLeaks, is it likely Assange will have an accident of the 'Boston brakes' kind in the coming years? Or will he be snared with compromising information of the 'honey trap' kind?
 - 'Drozd' at Flashback 23 October 2010

The truth will out, the truth wins out. Let no journalist ever again speculate into what the protocols say. Six months of digging and the people at Flashback have the actual documents. The sleaze printed by rags such as the Daily Mail, Sweden's Aftonbladet and Expressen, and perhaps above all the toxic Nick Davies of the Guardian, can stand no more. Yet more: these documents are an indictment of the 'news organisations' who've printed deliberate inaccuracies all along or even worse: refused to print anything at all. Nick Davies' account of the protocols was maliciously skewed; both Aftonbladet and Expressen had copies early on and printed nothing. Bloggers had copies but arrogantly kept the information to their Smeagol selves.
 - The Assange Police Protocol: Translator's Note

See Also
Industry Watch: Assange in Sweden: An Exchange
Industry Watch: Jen-Rob Meets Carl Bildt
Learning Curve: Assange Case: Björn's Letter to Jennifer
Industry Watch: Assange, FSI, Marianne Ny, & The Swedish Media
Hall of Monkeys: That Double Crossing Marianne Ny
Industry Watch: Assange in Sweden: Charges Filed Against Marianne Ny
Industry Watch: Marianne Ny on Trial
Industry Watch: Assange & Sweden: Letters to Marianne Ny
Red Hat Diaries: 'Try Me for Rape Too, Marianne Ny!'
Red Hat Diaries: Lady Sarah Ludford MEP Questions EAW Abuses of Marianne Ny
Learning Curve: Assange Case: Many Questions, Few Answers
Learning Curve: No Questioning Assange in the UK?
Industry Watch: PROOF: Julian Assange Didn't Flee Sweden
Industry Watch: 7th December
Industry Watch: Assange: Unlawful Interference by Mats Gehlin?
Industry Watch: Ny: 'I Don't Want to Discuss It'
Industry Watch: Assange Arrested Again
Red Hat Diaries: Assange: Decisions Can Wait
Red Hat Diaries: Agreed Facts?
Industry Watch: Julian Assange & The Swedish Feminist Conspiracy
Red Hat Diaries: How to Rape Julian Assange Twice
Industry Watch: WikiLeaks: Enemy Action?
Red Hat Diaries: Assange Case Should Set Off Alarms
The Technological: Björn Hurtig to Jennifer Robinson: Subject: SV: Our client
Industry Watch: Assange in Sweden: The Longbow Six

Facebook: Intelligent classy well-educated women who say 'f*ck' a lot

About | ACP | Buy | Forum | Industry Watch | Learning Curve | Search | Twitter | Xnews
Copyright © Rixstep. All rights reserved.