What Kind of Judiciary

STOCKHOLM/GOTHENBURG/LONDON (Rixstep) — Flashback forum member 'guaponi' had a few things to say about the resident forum troll earlier today.

'Psychopaths lie and manipulate. You're the psychopath in this forum. An extreme psychopath. Most trolls give up after a while when confronted with irrefutable evidence, but you? You disappear for a while, dodge the questions tossed at you, and then return to heave up all the earlier bile all over again. You disgust me.'

But that wasn't the end. That was only the beginning.

Here's guaponi's entire post, formatted as a list.

Happy New Year.

Assange hasn't been granted asylum for some nonpolitical crime. Stop falsifying. Here's a video that clearly shows why Assange is entitled to asylum.
Other countries would grant him asylum. At what other countries has he tried to get asylum? Where do you get your information? And you don't think that Snowden should be granted asylum either! Not a single western state is willing to grant Snowden asylum. But if he was CHINESE and still done the same thing, there wouldn't be a single western land which wouldn't grant him asylum! It's more than sufficiently clear that Europe is being run like a puppet in this case (Hague's plan to storm the Ecuador embassy) and in similar cases (forcing down the presidential plane of Evo Morales in the Snowden case) or by using various pressure points to influence a country's judiciary (the trial of The Pirate Bay).
You're a torturer-hugger. You are, straight through and through, an evil human being. That's bloody obvious to all.
Why do you call Ecuador a 'banana republic'? Keep to the facts of the case. It's through eminently accessible information, in the form of electronic correspondence, that we see clearly that there is one part acting constructively and an opposing part doing the opposite. One part which on over thirty occasions tried to arrange for constructive dialogue and the opposing part which refused. You have the one part which through its incompetence cannot submit an application for interviews in time. You have one part that blames it all on the other part and comes with unfounded claims about granting Assange asylum, claiming the other part obstructed with unreasonable demands, delays, and so forth. All of this spread to the world media. The sad fact is that when this all comes up on the table (I hope the prevaricators read it) then it will be shown to be the exact opposite. All the while Ecuador tried to help, Sweden behaved like a rogue state. This is today well documented, no longer open to discussion.

And when it comes to the judiciary. What state would have a 'special' prosecutor's office to jump in when the ordinary prosecutor already ruled that 'no crime has been committed'? What state has a judiciary with a 'special' prosecutor who thinks it's a good idea to punish people, who make her 'uncomfortable', with extrajudicial sentences? What judiciary plants cocaine as evidence, has police who lie under oath, and who sends people around over and over again, to have them tried for the same thing in new jurisdictions?

What state detains people on completely undocumented interrogations? What judiciary lames out about recording witness testimony - and only for the prosecution, never for the defence? What country only uses the European Arrest Warrant in very serious cases, except in one case where there most likely is no crime at all committed and where crime can never be proved?

The list is endless. Swedish justice is a catastrophe from beginning to end, and in the Assange case, they've outdone themselves in incompetence. Clearcut cases, where serious crime has been committed, are closed - not because crime cannot be proven, but because the police suddenly 'ran out of resources' - whilst at the same time, they waste inordinate sums in persecution of people that those in power find 'uncomfortable'.